History

July 13th, 2012 by David

Starting during our flight to Poland, Lindsey and I have been reading The Bloodlands, the history of how Stalin and Hitler murdered 14 million people in the 1930s and 40s. I knew about the horrors of the Holocaust, but I didn't know about how Hitler killed Soviet prisoners of war, or of how the Nazis killed millions of non-combatant civilians, or how Stalin chose to starve a few million Ukrainians in the 1930s. Most of these atrocities occurred in the lands between the Soviet Union and Germany, and most actually happened outside of concentration camps, through shooting or starving.

On our second full day in Poland, we took a bus an hour and a half to visit Auschwitz, the most infamous site of the Holocaust, where more than a million people, mostly Jews, were put to their death in gas chambers and then cremated. By the numbers, more civilians were shot or starved than gassed during World War II, yet I still find the gas chambers the most terrifying part of these years. The civilization of Jews in Eastern Europe was destroyed, partially through the efficiency of these chambers. It is especially disturbing to walk around the former Jewish district of Krakow. Jews were once about a third of the population of the city (and 10 percent of Poland's polulation). Now there are almost none.

Below is a photo of the former gas chamber, which the Nazis blew up before the arrival of Soviet forces. Also pictured is the train tracks, which brought passengers to be gassed.

 

For my job, I help a foundation with its efforts to fight climate change, largely through education campaigns of the U.S. public. I believe that climate change is a serious threat that we must address. Yet as I look at these death sites, apart from the overwhelming disgust, I feel luck. It is a luxury to worry about problems like climate change in comparison to the horrors of World War II.

Another book I read this year (or read most of) was The Better Angels of our Nature, by Steven Pinker. It made the argument, somewhat convincingly, that violence has declined remarkably over history. Pinker claims that as a percentage of the population, far fewer people died due to violence or warfare in the last decade than in any decade in history. The decrease is largely cultural–due to education and increased empathy, acts of violence are not acceptable in the way that they once were.

Once, in a land where people were killed in the millions, I can ride my bike safely across borders and my only threat is saddle sores. It seems like a different world entirely. I asked one of our hosts, who is our age, about what people think about the Germans and Russians today. Mostly, he said, people respect the Germans for their economic organization.

Poland was decimated by WWII. It lost its large Jewish population (which settled there partially because the region was slightly less intolerant than the surrounding regions), as well as much of its elite, who were also murdered by Soviets or Nazis. Yet today we can easily cross borders, there is no fear of war, and people are worried about economic issues and not violence. I'd say that's progress. It is as if we have moved, as a society, higher on Malsow's Hierarchy of Needs. Once we figure out (or have mostly figured out) how not to kill each other, we can worry about how to better live together.

 


 

Photos from Poland

July 9th, 2012 by David

Below are photos from three and a half days in Poland. In another post, I’ll add impressions from visiting Aushchwitz, walking around Krakow, and talking to our hosts about history and climate change. It is a lot to process.

Click next to see more.
[shashin type=”albumphotos” id=”18″ size=”small” crop=”n” columns=”max” caption=”y” order=”date” position=”center”]


 

Welcome to Poland

July 9th, 2012 by David

Our second and third nights in Poland we stayed with Maciek and Magda, a young couple active in Krakow's bike touring community. Here they are saying “Welcome to Poland” in Polish:

 

 
 

 

Arrival in Poland

July 9th, 2012 by David

From SFO to Krakow’s John Paul II Airport, according to my GPS (which I left on the entire flight), we logged almost 6,000 miles of flying.

I uploaded this flight to Strava (a website for sharing bike rides recorded by GPS), but for some reason, Strava didn’t think we had biked the distance, and didn’t process it (Strava wouldn’t believe we were biking at 500 miles an hour).

We were met at the airport by Iwo, who we met via the warm showers website, at eleven thirty at night. He led us, by bike, about four kilometers to his house.

[shashin type=”photo” id=”350″ size=”medium” columns=”max” order=”user” position=”center”]

Tarrapass estimates that by flying, we emitted, combined, about 5,000 pounds of carbon dioxide. By biking from the airport instead of driving, I estimated that we saved about one to two pounds. (Here’s the blog entry on buying offsets.)


 

Gear

July 3rd, 2012 by David

Here's what we're taking on our bike trip form Krakow to Croatia. Did we forget anything?

Not pictured: our four panniers (two rear for each bike), some of Lindsey's clothes, my biking sandals, my flip flops, my helmet. I've found that the key to traveling light is using a super small sleeping bag, sleeping pad, stove, and tent. Both our sleeping bags fit in the red stuff sack behind Lindsey’s helmet. We're using a Tarptent, the lightest Thermarests, and a home made alcohol stove. We're also betting that it will be hot in Eastern Europe, and that we won't regret not bringing any warm clothes…

 


 

Carbon Offsets for a Bike Trip

July 3rd, 2012 by David

According to Terrapass, Lindsey and I will each be responsible for almost 5,500 pounds of carbon dioxide by flying from San Francisco to Europe and back. 5,500 pounds, or about 2.5 metric tons, is half as much carbon as the average Serbian or Croatian produces in an entire year.

Moreover, as summarized on Oroeco, the contrails of jets, because of the radiative property of clouds, may double the global warming effects of flying. In other words, we aren't saving the earth with this vacation.

I'd also like to point out that flying is absolutely amazing. In just a few hours, we will board a flying machine that will take us halfway around the world in less than a day of travel. Compared to past centuries of civilization, we would appear like gods. The comedian Louis CK does a good job of summing up how amazing this is (and how we've become unaware of how awesome it is) in this video.

Flight has brought humanity enormous good, and it has allowed the world be connected in a way that would otherwise be impossible. I wonder if people would care as much about global problems if they weren't able to fly and see the globe.

The solution isn't to stop flying (although better telecommuting can avoid the need for some flights). The solution is for us to figure out how to fly without polluting. That will likely be really hard–batteries are too heavy for flight, and biofuels require large amounts of land and water. Nonetheless, we figured out how to fly. I'm sure that if we put effort in (investment, lots of it) we can figure this out.

I wish I could spend a bit extra on my flight to invest in the development of non-polluting flight technology. But the airlines don't offer that, so I will do the next best thing and buy carbon offsets. Obviously, offsets are imperfect, but at least we're doing something about our pollution.

So, for two people flying to Europe, we bought offsets for 11,000 pounds of carbon dioxide, which cost us $65 on Terrapass. Yes, that is a lot of money, but it is small compared to the price (gulp) of the ticket, and it is one tenth of what the airlines are charging us to ship two bikes to Europe and back ($150 per bike per leg!).

At least we're taking public transit to the airport. I only hope that BART lets us take the bikes on at rush hour…


 

Satellites and Social Networks

July 2nd, 2012 by David

We’re almost ready to leave for Poland and start our ride from Krakow to Dubrovnik. Below are two of our training rides from the past weekend, as recorded by Strava.

On my last trip, at the end of every day I’d write down the odometer’s reading. Once every few days, at an Internet cafe, I’d enter those miles. Using what was usually an XP Windows computer, I’d also open Paint, draw a line on a map, and then upload the updated image. How tedious!

That was 2006. It is now 2012, and satellites and social networks have freed us from those dark days. I’m brining my Garmin 500 GPS, which I’ll sync with Strava. Of course, I now have to bring an extra battery and solar charger to power the device. but all the mapping will be done automatically online once we connect the GPS to a computer (which we’ll do every few days).

Here are our two training rides from the weekend (which we did with our panniers to get ready):

Here we are on Old La Honda, with all of our gear.
[shashin type=”photo” id=”338″ size=”medium” columns=”max” order=”user” position=”center”]


 

Which bike should I ride across Europe?

June 28th, 2012 by David

I promised I'd write about climate change and what we learn about Eastern Europe, but right now I have a more pressing decision to make: Which bike should I bring to Europe?

This is what I like to call #firstworldproblems — which of my five bikes should I take on vacation?

I have already ruled out the following three bikes. My racing bike is beautiful and fast, but it can't cary 30 lbs. The mountain bike is amazing, but it also can't carry weight. The folding bike is, in theory, meant for this type of vacation, but I don't want to pull the trailer. (It folds into a suitcase that can become a trailer. If I took this bike, I'd have to take the trailer in order to fly home with it, as we're not flying out of the same airport that we're arriving at. Also, its small wheels make me a bit slower.)

The bikes are shown below in their natural environment:

 

There's a story behind each of these (mt. bike on craigslist, folding bike as a going away gift from an old job, and racing bike that I built piece by piece over a few months), but let's focus on the remaining two bikes I'm choosing between: my steel super-touring bike, and my carbon fiber touring bike.


Bike Model: Bruce Gordon Rock 'n Road Tour-ex

Given Name: del Fuego

Story: This beast/bike was a gift from my father for finishing my masters' program. We both got Bruce Gordon bikes and rode across the country in the summer of 2003, from Virginia to Oregon. I then took this bike and rode from Palo Alto to Ushuaia, Argentina, and then across the U.S. again on the Ride for Climate project. Needless to say, this bike has had a good life.

The problem with this bike is that it weighs about 35 pounds. It has downhill rino-lite rims, as well as super strong tubing. (One reason for the weight is I added a two pound kickstand, which props the bike up as shown in the picture.) This bike is slow. On the other hand, this bike will not break. You could run a truck over it. In fact, Aerolinas Argentinas did run a truck over it at the Ushuaia Airport. The frame was fine. The wheels needed to be replaced…

In all, this bike has more than 25,000 miles of loaded touring, and over the years I've replaced every part except the hubs and the frame.

 

Bike Model: Pedal Force CX2

Given Name: The Black Death

Story: I had a steel commuter bike (mid 90s REI), but the frame broke in early 2011. My boss at the time, an avid cyclist, had purchased a Pedal Force cyclocross frame, but then realized it was too big for him. He sold it to me at a great discount, and I built it up with a mix of old and new components. It is made of carbon fiber, but it has eyelets for a rack, and is designed to hold abut 15 to 20 lbs. I used it on this tour, which was awesome.

I commute to work on this bike, which weighs about 27 lbs. (it has heavy-duty wheels, a rear rack, and fenders, making it heavier and sturdier than most carbon bikes). One of my friends started calling it “The Black Death,” and the name stuck. It earned that name because carbon fiber, though extremely strong, can shatter if it is damaged. It is also, of course, black.

I love this bike. It is fun to ride and beautiful to look at. Pedal Force didn't cover it with decals, and I give them huge props for that. I emailed the company to ask about touring on it, and they said that they didn't recommend more than 220 lbs. for rider + gear. I weigh just under 190, and I'll be carrying just under 30, so it is extremely tempting to take this bike and ride 8 fewer pounds over the Tatras Mountains.

While I'm still undecided, I'm leaning towards the steel bike. Even though this is only a three week trip, and we're traveling light, the memory of the truck running over my bike burns in my mind. I might be a little slower, but I'll have a lot more peace of mind. However, I am afraid I won't be able to keep up with my girlfriend. Maybe I'll have her carry all the gear…


 

Ride for Climate E. Europe

June 22nd, 2012 by David

Next month, in the three and half weeks before I start a new full time position, my girlfriend and I will be taking a bike trip across Eastern Europe. Below is an approximate map of our route:


View Ride for Climate Eastern Europe in a larger map

We choose this because we wanted a relatively first world experience for our first tour together, and neither Lindsey nor I have been to Eastern Europe (we call it “exotic Europe”). I actually know extremely little about these countries. I don’t even know what the currencies are or what variation of the alphabet they use. I do know that Poland has been repartitioned many times by surrounding powers, that Slovakia was once part of Czechoslovakia, Hungary is not spelled Hungry, Serbia and Bosnia were at war very recently (and you can’t camp in Bosnia for fear of landmines), and Croatia has very nice beaches and bad traffic.

The total mileage should be around 600 to 800 miles.

This is primarily a vacation, but perhaps because I don’t know how to travel without blogging and writing about climate change, I’ll be posting here about the trip and also about what climate change means for these countries. I want to know how they are vulnerable and how they are responding. It will be informal, and hopefully, fun. I will download some papers about the region for the flight, and talk to people along the way.

(And yes, we are buying carbon offsets for our flights.)

Here are some basic facts about the countries we’ll be riding across:

Poland
Population: 38 million
GDP per capita (ppp): $20,300
CO2 emissions per capita: 8.3 metric tons

Slovakia
Population: 5.4 million
GDP per capita (ppp): $23,300
CO2 emissions per capita: 7.0 metric tons

Hungary
Population: 10.0 million
GDP per capita (ppp): $19,600
CO2 emissions per capita: 5.5 metric tons

Serbia(we might not make it here!)
Population: 7.1 million
GDP per capita (ppp):$10,600
CO2 emissions per capita: 5.1

Croatia
Population: 4.3 million
GDP per capita (ppp): $18,200
CO2 emissions per capita: 5.3 metric tons

Bosnia and Herzegovina
Population: 3.8 million
GDP per capita (ppp): $8,100
CO2 emissions per capita: 8.3 metric tons

(Populations are for 2011, as are GDP per capitas. CO2 emissions are for 2008. All these figures come from the great source of information we call Wikipedia.)

Well, now I know that every country is relatively wealthy, except Bosnia and Serbia, which are on the cusp between developing and developed. In my own, non-expert experience, that is what I call countries at the $10k mark for gdp per capita — I’ve also found those are usually the best countries to bike across. We’ll find out soon.


 

New Prologue, Book Update, and Kroodsma.com

May 19th, 2012 by David

I have just recently updated the book’s prologue, which you can see here. It has changed significantly from the previous version (and I think it better introduces you to the purpose and spirit of the journey), so I recommend taking a look.

Also, I’m currently adding, on occasion, content to my other blog, kroodsma.com, where I’m sharing interesting data visualizations.