Wisconsin Montage – 20%

June 17th, 2007 by David

Another few hours in front of imovie has produced the following montage of biking across Wisconsin. The music in the background is provided by Peter Mulvey, a musician who biked with us out of Milwaukee.

In addition to scenery of us biking and camping across Wisconsin, we share one fact about global warming: over 20% of all known species of plants and animals may be at risk to extinction due to global warming (source: the IPCC’s recent report). This would radically transform the natural world, and it would be a major tragedy. Think about it – one out of every five species of birds, plants, animals, gone. Why should we accept this?

We end the film with a practical suggestion from one person we stayed with in La Crosse, WI — change a lightbulb to a more efficient bulb. It saves you money, and will result in power plants putting less carbon dioxide into the atmopshere. It will lessen global warming.

And of course, there is bonus material at the end of our film. Watch below.

Biking in Madison is Great!

June 12th, 2007 by David

Madison Wisconsin has some of the best bikeways I have ever seen. The biking here is excellent, and a incredible number of people bike to work or use the bicycle as transportation. It is great to see, and it makes me ask, why not do this in more communities? Doesn’t it feel great when you are able to bike to work? You are healthier, you save money, and, of course, you don’t add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Why not demand better bikeways?

The video below (really a ‘music video’) says it better. Click and watch.


(The music in the background is provided by the Motor Primitives)

Biking with the Mayor of Madison

June 12th, 2007 by David

Mayor Dave (he goes by his first name) met us on our first day in Madison, Wisconsin, and went for a short bike ride. The mayor is doing excellent work to reduce Madison’s greenhouse gas emissions. Click on the video below to watch!

Fort Atkinson, WI – Our First Vlog

June 7th, 2007 by David

We have decided to try to use the video editing powers of the laptop we are (er…I am) carrying and do some vloging (‘video logging’). Below are two videos. The first we edited together from our stop in Fort Atkinson, WI, where we gave a talk at the Cafe Carpe and met a number of people making a difference on global warming. The second is a video of our day biking from Fort Atkinson to Madison, where we were warned of tornadoes all day long. (The second is a bit more exciting…)

Let us know if you enjoy these and would like to see more!

A night in Fort Atkinson:

(Note: a great website for energy audits in Wisconsin: www.focusonenergy.com)

Avoiding storms on the way to Madison:

Chicago

June 5th, 2007 by David

After our ride with Father Charles, Bill and I biked two more days across Michigan to Muskegon, where we caught a ferry across Lake Michigan to Milwaukee. From there, we took a train to Chicago, leaving our bikes in Milwaukee.

In Chicago, we stayed a night with Kathy Schubert, who is shown on the left with her faithful companion Joey (yes, Joey is the dog). (Joey also just turned 13, and as Kathy is Jewish, she showed us pictures of Joey celebrating her ‘bark mitzvah’) Kathy is highly involved in many cycling events through the city, and organized a bike ride event for us to travel Chicago and see various environmental sites in Chicago.

Fortunately, Kathy has a few extra bikes (about 7, to be precise), so I was able to get on a bike for the ride. Some 40 cyclists joined us, and we weaved about the city, visiting a random collection of ‘green sites,’ including green roofs, vacant lots that have been turned into tiny farms (within the city limits), energy efficient buildings, and the Chicago River. I did not think of the Chicago river as being an environmentally positive site, as it has a sign reading ‘water unfit to touch your skin,’ but, according to the other cyclists with us, it is incredibly clean compared to a few decades ago.

In all, Chicago is a fairly ‘green’ city, and the mayor has a promise to become the nation’s ‘greenest city.’ The city has a large push for green roofs, which reduce dirty runnoff into the lake and also reduce air conditioning bills. I found the city very easy to bike around (although many of the buses were wanting), and learned that there is a very ambitious plan to make the cycling even better. The city is installing solar panels on many city buildings, and planting thousands of trees.

One of my goals in Chicago was to reach the Latino community, and I was fortunate to appear both on Telemundo Chicago, and give a talk to a large auditorium of Latinos (I had to give the talk in Spanish). Bill and I also gave a talk for a group of younger students (in English), and a talk at Chicago’s Lincoln Park library.

Michigan Interfaith Power & Light

June 2nd, 2007 by Bill

We scheduled many events for this project months in advance. At the same time we were scheduling events, we were also trying to figure out our bicycle route. As we rode towards Michigan, we realized that we didn’t have time to do the talk in Monroe and still get to Chicago on time for events there. So we utilized multi-modal transportation. This is a great term that means using more than one mode of transportation to reach your destination. A few cities offer good multi-modal transportation where you can, for example, ride your bike to the bus and put the bike on a rack and then bus across town before hopping on your bike again to reach your destination. Many cities need further work to make this a realistic form of transportation for people.

We looked into a train but soon found that this Amtrak line does not allow bicycles. Then Father Charles came to the rescue. Father Charles is a friend who helped to set-up our talk in Monroe. He was already heading to Grand Rapids for a conference and offered to give us a ride in his Honda Civic Hybrid. We caught a ride to E. Lansing which took 120 miles off of our route (no, we don’t count these miles in our total) and allowed us to reach Chicago in time for the group ride. We also had the opportunity to interview Father Charles and hear why he is so concerned about global warming and what he is doing about it.

Father Charles was ordained a Catholic Priest in 1983. In the 90’s he went back to school and got a masters degree in urban planning with a focus on environmental justice. His interest in global warming peaked due to three main things:

1. A woman in his parish challenged him to rekindle his interest in environmental concerns (again showing the impact one person can have);
2. Dr. James Hansen of Nasa gave testimony in 1988 about the emerging threat of global warming;
3. He read Dream of the Earth by Thomas Berry.

Father Charles went on to start Michigan Interfaith Power and Light (and this how I met him – when I worked for the national organization). Michigan Interfaith Power and Light works with member congregations to educate people of global warming and find practical solutions. They help congregations save money with energy efficient products, work with congregations to find developers and contractors who can build with energy conservation and efficiency in mind and educate others about these solutions.

In his own Church, they invested $160K in things such as a much more efficient boiler, new lighting, energy efficient windows, and Energy Star appliances. The results were a 60% reduction of energy use and a savings of over $20,000 each year in energy costs. Results like these are possible for many homes and buildings by conducting an energy audit and implementing the findings.

Visiting the Sisters of Monroe, Michigan

June 1st, 2007 by Bill

We rode along farm roads into Monroe, Michigan and arrived on a warm afternoon at the Immaculate Heart of Mary (IHM) Motherhouse. This is a 280 acre community of over 500 vowed sisters. Their website describes an important part of their mission:

“In today’s world, people are often alienated from one another and from the Earth. There is unequal access to the resources of the planet; oppression of persons and cultures for the material benefit of a few; consumerism promoted as the preferred way of life; and devastating pollution to our land, air and water. There is a longing for spiritual expression and a balanced way of life.

Our IHM community considers sustainability a moral mandate for the 21st century. We are re-visioning our community and our entire Monroe campus in ways that respond to the wider needs of the world, focusing on the interdependency and interrelation of economic, environmental and social equity.”

Sister Sue gave us a tour of the main building — an impressive art-deco structure that was built in the 1930’s and recently renovated. Many elements of sustainable design went into the renovation, but a few energy-related highlights include:

A geothermal heating and cooling system that utilizes the Earth’s constant 55 degree temperature. Water is circulated underground through 54 miles of pipe and used to help with both heating and cooling of the 376,000 sq. foot Motherhouse.
Energy consumption was reduced by maximum use of daylighting, programmed lighting, and energy efficient lighting (including many 1930’s fixtures which were restored and updated for use with energy efficient light bulbs).
Resused & salvaged materials including doors and windows and marble.
A graywater system which saves 6,200 gallons of water a day from heading directly to an energy intensive water treatment plant. It captures water from sinks and showers and filters it through a constructed wetland before returning it to the Motherhouse for use in flushing toilets.

The average age of the 220 resident sisters is 86. These women have taken on a huge committment to offer a model for others. David and I had a fantastic time hearing about the work they have done and hopefully gained some wisdom from their learning. We gave a presentation to the sisters and to people from the local community and appeared in the local newspaper.

Toledo

May 22nd, 2007 by David

We spent a day in Toledo, where we gave three presentations at the Maumee Country Day School — one for the high school, one for the elementary school, and one for the parents. The best part, though, was that all the older students in the elementary school brought their bikes to school and did a 7-mile ‘mini ride for climate’ to a nearby park and back. (Although, to bike safely in the city, we needed a team of police cars to block off roads.) The television news showed up, and we appeared in the Toledo Blade newspaper.

The article in the newspaper was great overall, but the reporter got the idea that global warming would only be bad for people in South America (I show pictures of my bike trip across South America and talk about the effects of global warming there). The article started with “Toledo-area residents may not notice much change in their daily lives due to global warming,” which was not what I wanted people in Toledo to read.

It is true that global warming will be worse for poor developing nations than Toledo — but Toledo residents will nonetheless see major changes. According to one study summarized here, by the end of the century, summers in Ohio could be similar to the summers in Arkansas. Summers will not only be warmer, but also likely drier. Common fish in Lake Erie could disappear, lake levels would fall, and both strong storms and droughts — such as the 2002 drought, which ravaged Ohio, would become more common.

I wrote a letter to the editor with this information, and, perhaps more importantly, added information about global warming and Ohio to the presentation. (Of course, now we are in Michigan…so we have to keep updating the presentation as we go…)

Way To Go Ohio

May 20th, 2007 by Bill

Departing Pittsburgh, we pedaled towards Ohio on a drenched Wednesday. At the height of the rain storm, David’s stem (the part that connects the handlebars to the frame) snapped. I have never heard of someone’s stem breaking before (it’s solid metal), but it probably had something to do with the fact that he purchased the stem when he was biking across Argentina. Luckily, we were only 2 miles from a bicycle shop and, with help from our friend Tim , we were on our way.

We arrived in Ohio happy to leave behind the steep rolling hills of western Pennsylvania. Our first stop was Rogers, OH where we met Lloyd Willis and his family. Lloyd works as a parts manager for General Motors and is a dedicated cyclist and bicycle racer. His entire family takes part and they even teach spin classes in their basement. Lloyd talked to us about he often commutes 20 miles each way to work on his ultra light-weight racing bicycle. He said he shows up to work wide awake and arrives home having put in 40 miles of riding and a full day of work. Yet many people look at him as if he’s crazy for riding his bike instead of taking the car. Lloyd gets to do what he loves (bicycle), gets great exercise and saves a bunch of money on gas. Who is crazy?

We stayed with Ed and Barb just outside Youngstown , OH. They treated us to an amazing dinner including some halibut they caught last summer in Alaska. Youngstown, like many towns we passed in this part of the country is shrinking in population even as the US population is growing. This a beautiful part of the US, but the economy of coal, cars, steel and other industry collapsed years ago and the economy still struggles. I wonder how many new jobs could be created with renewable energy. Unfortunately, Ohio doesn’t have a “renewable portfolio standard (RPS)“. RPS is legislation that says a state will produce a certain amount of their energy from renewable sources by a certain date. For example Montana will produce 15% of their energy from renewable sources by 2015. Ohio is one of about 30 states that has not yet passed this legislation. Although it’s no guarantee of new jobs, it does signal to renewable energy companies that the state is serious about promoting renewable energy.

We left Ed and Barb’s house, had a live radio interview (‘Morning with Mangino’) and pedaled on north to the suburbs of Cleveland. There we stayed with Sharon and Ben, who get the prize for most energy efficient household so far (all energy saving light bulbs and a Toyota Prius Hybrid car). The next morning we biked over to the Laurel School to give a presentation to 8th grade girls. What an amazing group of kids! They knew so much about global warming and solutions that they should be riding across the country giving talks.

We left Laurel School in the suburbs and headed toward downtown Cleveland. Our route took us through East Cleveland, parts of which are in serious disrepair. Along the waterfront route we passed a coal burning power plant and a demonstration wind turbine. Which would you prefer in your neighborhood? (Aside from David: More importantly, who looks better – Bill in front of the coal plant, or David in front of the windmill?)

We rode alongside Lake Erie to the west side of Cleveland. Passing along the Cuyuhoga River I couldn’t help but think of our ability to make positive change even when a situation looks bleak. For those who don’t know this, the Cuyuhoga River is famous for catching fire several times in the 1960’s and 1970’s because it was so polluted. News of this helped to wake people up to the seriousness of the problem and began the changes, including the Clean Water Act, that many now take for granted. These changes only happened due to the hard work a few thoughtful and committed citizens.

We rode on 20 miles across Cleveland to Chris and Alys’s house. I went to graduate school with Alys a bunch of years back. Luckily for us, Chris is also renting a condo about 65 miles west in Port Clinton, OH. The next day we left our panniers (bike bags) with Chris to bring to the condo and we biked to Port Clinton. There was a headwind much of the day so, even without the panniers, it feel like we were dragging cinderblocks behind the bikes.

On the way to Port Clinton we found ourselves at the Sundusky Bay Bridge. It’s illegal to bicycle across it because they made no provision for a bike lane and therefore it’s not safe. But there’s no other way to cross by bicycle without going 35 miles out of your way. So we stuck out our thumbs and, within seconds, Don picked us up in his Ford F-150 pick-up truck. Although he works for Ford, he was mad that his F-150 gets 13mpg when his 1969 Camaro has “5 times the horse power” and gets nearly as good mileage. It’s a good question — could we do better?

A Revenue Neutral Carbon Tax?

May 17th, 2007 by David

While in Pittsburgh, in addition to staying with cyclist Tim Kelly, Bill and I visited some our friends in town, and I stayed with my friends Kip and Aaron (meanwhile, Bill stayed with his friends, April and John Paul) . My friend Aaron, shown on the right in his Pittsburgh apartment, recently finished his PhD in environmental economics (you can call him ‘Dr. Swoboda’ if you like) and is now a professor at the University of Pittsburgh (here is his blog). Over a drink, I asked Aaron how he would make us reduce our carbon dioxide emissions.

“A revenue neutral carbon tax,” he told me.

The idea is to put a tax on carbon dioxide emissions, so that we have incentives to reduce our use of fossil fuels. This means energy from coal would cost more, as would gasoline. To make a difference, Aaron suggested that each gallon of gasoline might cost 50 cents to a dollar more. Aaron liked this solution because people who reduce their use of fossil fuel would be rewarded.

The revenue neutral part means that taxes elsewhere would be cut. For instance, income tax might be reduced. (The tricky part is that poorer people spend a much higher percentage of their paycheck on energy and gasoline, so they would be hurt more by a carbon tax – thus, their taxes would have to be cut much more). If done correctly, everyone would pay about the same amount of taxes, only now we would have a bigger incentive to pollute less and switch to non-greenhouse gas producing energy. Ok – yes, gas prices are already high, but this tax would be different, becuase instead of the money going to oil companies, the money would go towards lowering your taxes elsewhere.

I will admit that we got into a bit of an argument, as I argued that we should also have higher efficiency standards, and that we need more policies than just a tax to encourage us to be more efficient, to which Aaron replied that such efficiency standards were government interference when a carbon tax would be much simpler and have the same result.

I still believe in efficiency standards (as they are more politically viable as well), but why shouldn’t we take some of Aaron’s advice? Why not put a tax on things we should consume less of? Doesn’t a tax on gas and fossil fuels make some sense, especially if it is balanced with tax cuts elsewhere?